Premium
Effect of kidney transplantation on bone
Author(s) -
Kodras K.,
Haas M.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
european journal of clinical investigation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.164
H-Index - 107
eISSN - 1365-2362
pISSN - 0014-2972
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2006.01662.x
Subject(s) - medicine , renal osteodystrophy , transplantation , bone remodeling , secondary hyperparathyroidism , kidney transplantation , endocrinology , kidney disease , calcitriol , parathyroid hormone , dialysis , bone disease , vitamin d and neurology , kidney , osteoporosis , population , bone resorption , hyperparathyroidism , urology , calcium , environmental health
A broad range of different factors aggravates renal osteodystrophy, which is present in virtually all patients with chronic kidney disease and after successful kidney transplantation. Altered hormonal status, including sex hormones and parathyroid hormone (PTH), a deficit of 1,25(OH) 2 vitamin D 3 (calcitriol), immunosuppressive therapy and post‐operative immobilization contribute to a progressive loss of bone density and structure. The decrease of bone mass is particularly prominent during the first 6 months after kidney transplantation and is associated with an increased number of fractures, both compared with the normal population as well as with dialysis patients. At particular risk are patients with a history of diabetes, long duration of haemodialysis and post‐menopausal women. To prevent post‐transplant bone loss prescription of steroids should be minimized and withdrawn as early as possible. Additional intake of α‐calcidol [25(OH) vitamin D 3 ] or calcitriol, despite normal serum levels, reduces persistent hyperparathyroidism after kidney transplantation, improves intestinal calcium absorption and activates osteoblasts. Inhibition of osteoclasts by biphosphonate therapy seems to effectively reverse bone loss during the early and late course of kidney transplantation. However, as the majority of transplant recipients have a low‐turnover bone disease, inhibition of osteoclasts, through which bone turnover is impaired, might further reduce osteoblast activity and promote osteoid synthesis. Most investigations were small‐scale studies with 10–100 participants and a follow up of only 12 months. This makes conclusions on the effect of any intervention on the fracture rate impossible. Larger, randomized multicentre studies investigating bone‐sparing therapy on hard end points are therefore advocated.