Premium
Comparing the predictive value of neural network models to logistic regression models on the risk of death for small‐cell lung cancer patients
Author(s) -
BARTFAY E.,
MACKILLOP W.J.,
PATER J.L.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
european journal of cancer care
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.849
H-Index - 67
eISSN - 1365-2354
pISSN - 0961-5423
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00638.x
Subject(s) - logistic regression , medicine , lung cancer , artificial neural network , regression , cancer , regression analysis , predictive value , predictive modelling , intensive care medicine , artificial intelligence , statistics , machine learning , oncology , computer science , mathematics
Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality in the developed world, and prognostic assessment of cancer patients is indispensable in medical care. Medical researchers are accustomed to using regression models to predict patient outcomes. Neural networks have been proposed as an alternative with great potential. Nonetheless, empirical evidence remains lacking to support the application of this technique as the appropriate method to investigate cancer prognosis. Utilizing data on patients from two National Cancer Institute of Canada clinical trials, we compared predictive accuracy of neural network models and logistic regression models on risk of death of limited‐stage small‐cell lung cancer patients. Our results suggest that neural network and logistic regression models have similar predictive accuracy. The distributions of individual predicted probabilities are very similar. On occasion, however, the prediction pairs are quite different, suggesting that they do not always give the same interpretations of the same variables.