Premium
Developmental stress in wild‐living Drosophilids inferred from biometry: metric and meristic traits react differently to heterogeneous environmental conditions
Author(s) -
YASSIN AMIR,
ABOUYOUSSEF AMIRA Y.,
BITNERMATHÉ BLANCHE,
CAPY PIERRE,
DAVID JEAN R.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
ecological entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.865
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1365-2311
pISSN - 0307-6946
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00911.x
Subject(s) - biology , meristics , bristle , fluctuating asymmetry , heritability , zoology , larva , trait , drosophila (subgenus) , ectotherm , evolutionary biology , ecology , genetics , gene , brush , computer science , electrical engineering , programming language , engineering
1. During their development in natural conditions, Drosophila larvae and pupae face heterogeneous environmental conditions (HEC). Analysing the morphology of wild‐living adults is a means of evaluating the effects of HEC. 2. Two drosophilid species of the Zaprionus genus that recently invaded the Nile delta were investigated, and three metric, size‐related traits, and one meristic trait, the sternopleural bristle number, were measured. Data were compared with those of F 1 generation reared under favourable laboratory conditions. 3. Body size was smaller in nature, but also extremely variable among individuals, with an average coefficient of variation (CV) of 9.1 ± 0.3, against a much lesser value of 2.4 ± 0.1 in laboratory flies. Correlations among size traits were also greater in nature (0.96 ± 0.01) than in the laboratory (0.75 ± 0.04). 4. By contrast, sternopleural bristles produced similar results in wild‐living and laboratory flies. In nature, mean numbers were only slightly less than in the laboratory and the CVs were almost identical (10.87 ± 0.70 vs 10.80 ± 0.76). 5. Fluctuating asymmetry of sternopleural bristles was also identical in the two kinds of flies, and was not influenced by HEC, indicating a high level of developmental canalisation with respect to HEC. 6. The implications of the results for the problems of field heritability and developmental stability are discussed.