Premium
Within‐tree and among‐tree variation in growth of Epirrita autumnata on mountain birch leaves
Author(s) -
SUOMELA JANNE,
NILSON ANNA
Publication year - 1994
Publication title -
ecological entomology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.865
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1365-2311
pISSN - 0307-6946
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1994.tb00389.x
Subject(s) - biology , shoot , betula pubescens , botany , larva , tree (set theory) , betulaceae , foraging , horticulture , ecology , mathematics , mathematical analysis
.1 We studied among‐tree and within‐tree variation in the growth of larvae of a geometrid, Epirrita autumnata , on mountain birch ( Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa ) leaves at different hierarchical levels: among trees (genets), among ramets within trees, among branches within ramets, among shoots within branches and among leaves within shoots. We used only short shoot leaves, which burst simultaneously in spring. 2 Trees accounted for most of the variation in larval growth rate, but there was substantial variation also among ramets within trees, among branches within ramets, and among short shoots within branches. Variation among leaves within short shoots was negligible. When the probabilities from different experiments were combined, the differences were statistically significant at the tree, ramet and branch levels, and approached significance at the shoot level. 3 In different experiments, larval growth was from 9% to 54% lower on the worst tree than on the best tree of the experiment. On average, larval growth rate was in different experiments from 11% to 32% lower on the worst ramet than on the best ramet within tree, from 8% to 18% lower on the worst than on the best branch within ramet, and from 12% to 30% lower on the worst than on the best shoot within branch. 4 The amount of among‐and within‐tree variation shown by our results may have ecological and evolutionary implications: among‐tree variation should select for discrimination by ovipositing females and dispersing larvae, within‐tree variation should select also for optimal foraging behaviour of larvae.