Premium
Tissue rinse liquid‐based cytology: a feasible tool for the intraoperative pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients
Author(s) -
Yamashiro K.,
Taira K.,
Nakajima M.,
Okuyama D.,
Azuma M.,
Takeda H.,
Suzuki H.,
Jotoku H.,
Watanabe K.,
Takahashi M.,
Taguchi K.,
Tamura M.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.512
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1365-2303
pISSN - 0956-5507
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2011.00872.x
Subject(s) - medicine , lymph , micrometastasis , sentinel lymph node , breast cancer , cytology , lymph node , pathology , sentinel node , cancer
K. Yamashiro, K. Taira, M. Nakajima, D. Okuyama, M. Azuma, H. Takeda, H. Suzuki, H. Jotoku, K. Watanabe, M. Takahashi, K. Taguchi and M. Tamura
Tissue rinse liquid‐based cytology: a feasible tool for the intraoperative pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer patients Objectives: A unique diagnostic method was designed for the intraoperative pathological evaluation of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer patients, and the results were verified with 2 years of experience. Methods: Excised lymph nodes were cut into 2‐mm‐thick slices and rinsed thoroughly in CytoRich Red ® . The sliced tissues were embedded in a paraffin block. Three cytological glass slides of the cells exfoliated in CytoRich Red ® were prepared by the SurePath ® liquid‐based cytology (LBC) technique. Two slides were stained by the Papanicolaou method, and the remaining slide was immunostained with an anti‐keratin antibody. This process is called tissue rinse liquid‐based cytology (TRLBC). The results of TRLBC were compared with those of the final pathological diagnoses, including immunostaining with an anti‐keratin antibody on paraffin blocks (PB). Results: This study analysed 444 SLNs from 247 consecutive breast cancer patients. It required 35 minutes to complete the intraoperative diagnosis on a single node, and it took an additional 5 minutes per node if more than one node was submitted. When the results of PB were assumed to be the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of TRLBC were 81.9% and 96.1%, respectively. TRLBC detected all nodes with macrometastasis and 23 of 24 nodes with micrometastasis. Fifteen false‐negative TRLBC results were ‘isolated tumour cell clusters’ on PB, but there was one with micrometastasis histologically. Four of 14 false‐positive TRLBC results were proven to be true positive by supplementary examination using step sectioning of the paraffin blocks of the nodes. Conclusion: TRLBC is a feasible and promising intraoperative cytopathological tool showing a comparable efficacy to PB while still allowing the conventional postoperative histological examination.