Premium
P‐9
A COMPARISON OF THE REPORTING MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES OF GLANDULAR NEOPLASIA FOR CONVENTIONAL AND LIQUID BASED CYTOLOGY FOR CERVICAL SAMPLES
Author(s) -
Salmasi S.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
cytopathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.512
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1365-2303
pISSN - 0956-5507
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2303.2006.00392_13_9.x
Subject(s) - medicine , liquid based cytology , cervical cancer , cervical intraepithelial neoplasia , cytology , intraepithelial neoplasia , pathology , cancer , cervical screening , cervical cancer screening , koilocyte , oncology , prostate
Cervical cancer accounts for approximately 15% of cancer diagnosed in women worldwide with up to 190 000 deaths per annum. One of the major causes of cervical cancer is the infection of human papillomavirus (HPV), a DNA virus. This virus is epidermotropic; there are over 75 subtypes and subtypes 16, 18, 31 and 33 are associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and carcinomas. Since the start of the cervical screening in mid 1960s, the cervical cancer rate has decreased. There are two techniques used for slide preparation and staining: conventional cytology and liquid based cytology (LBC). Due to the differences in sample collection and preparation, certain aspects of cell morphology, architecture and patterns will present differently from each other on the slide. The study was conducted in a County Hospital. Twenty conventional slides and eight LBC slides already reported as ? Glandular neoplasia were reviewed and assessed with regards to their morphological features. Moreover, conventional slides were compared with LBC slides to determine the differences in their cell morphology, sensitivity and specificity. Furthermore, a semi‐quantitative method was used and also true‐positive and false‐positive rates were evaluated using positive predictive value (PPV). The findings indicated that despite the differences in cell morphology there are many similarities between the two techniques. The study also showed that it was difficult to distinguish between abnormal glandular cells and abnormal squamous cells, which may end in a false positive result and over reporting of glandular neoplasia. Finally, it showed that LBC slides were easier to screen and also had a higher positive predictive value (PPV) resulting in higher sensitivity and specificity. In conclusion, the LBC technique is more accurate and conversion to this technique is the positive step in the screening program.