z-logo
Premium
A blinded in‐vitro study to compare the efficacy of five topical ear drops in clearing grommets blocked with thick middle ear effusion fluid 1
Author(s) -
Uppal S.,
Sharma R.,
Nadig S.K.,
Back G.,
England R.J.A.,
Coatesworth A.P.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
clinical otolaryngology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.914
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1749-4486
pISSN - 1749-4478
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00920.x
Subject(s) - medicine , tympanometry , effusion , randomized controlled trial , anesthesia , audiometry , surgery , hearing loss , audiology
Objective:  To compare the efficacy of 5% NaHCO 3 , 3% H 2 O 2 , Sofradex (dexamethasone sodium metasulphobenzoate 0.05%, framycetin sulphate 0.5%, gramicidin 0.005%), 0.33% acetic acid and 0.9% NaCl eardrops in clearing grommets blocked with harvested thick middle ear effusion fluid. Study design:  A blinded in‐vitro study. Setting:  District general hospital. Participants:  A total of 473 grommets were blocked with freshly harvested unpooled thick middle ear effusion fluid obtained from 68 patients. Main outcome measures:  Patency of the grommets before and 7 days after intervention was ascertained by tympanometry and close visual inspection. Results:  Instillation of eardrops leads to a statistically significant increase in the clearance of grommets as compared with not using any drops ( χ 2  = 14.3, d.f. = 5, P  = 0.006). The numbers needed to treat were 2.8 for NaHCO 3 , 3.2 for 0.9% NaCl, 3.9 for 0.33% acetic Acid, 4.4 for Sofradex and 9.5 for H 2 O 2 eardrops. Pair‐wise comparison was only significant for comparison between 5% NaHCO 3 and 3% H 2 O 2 eardrops (Bonferroni corrected P  = 0.01, odds ratio = 4.3, CI = 1.9–9.9). Conclusions:  Use of eardrops leads to a clinically and statistically significant increase in the clearance of blocked grommets. Of the five drops used, 5% NaHCO 3 was the most efficacious and 3% H 2 O 2 the least efficacious. Limitations of this in‐vitro study are recognized and a prospective in‐vivo double blind randomized controlled trial is planned.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here