Open AccessCyclophosphamide treatment antagonizes the in vitro development of Mycobacterium lepraemurium ‐induced suppressor cell precursors
Author(s) -
GOSSELIN D.,
TURCOTTE R.,
LEMIEUX S.
Publication year - 1992
Publication title -
clinical & experimental immunology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.329
H-Index - 135
eISSN - 1365-2249
pISSN - 0009-9104
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2249.1992.tb06930.x
Subject(s) - suppressor , spleen , in vitro , biology , cell , cd8 , in vivo , flow cytometry , myeloid derived suppressor cell , cyclophosphamide , immunology , t cell , immune system , microbiology and biotechnology , biochemistry , chemotherapy , genetics , gene
SUMMARY The in vitro ‐inducible maturation of splenic suppressor cell precursors detected during the early phase of Mycobacterium lepraemurium infection can be abrogated when a high dose of cyclophosphamide (Cy) is inoculated to infected mice 2 days before assay. The drug does not act directly on adherent suppressor cell precursors, but rather inhibits their activation by a non‐adherent cell subset whose phenotype has not yet been elucidated. It was established by flow cytometry analyses, that despite a marked increase in the total number of splenic non‐adherent cells following M. lepraemurium infection, the effect of Cy on Ia + , Thy‐1 + , CD4 + and CD8 + cells in infected mice was comparable to that observed in normal controls. It was not possible to determine the duration of the inhibiting effect of Cy on non‐adherent regulatory cells, because the drug was itself inducing suppressor cells from 7 days after inoculation. By the time spleen cell suspensions were totally free of Cy‐induced suppressor cells, infection‐dependent suppressor cell precursors were once again detected, indicating that Cy treatment did not prevent their in vivo accumulation. Therefore, even though M, lepraemurium induced adherent suppressor cell precursors are themselves fully resistant to Cy, their development is transiently abrogated by the drug, most probably through the impairment of a non‐adherent cell subset regulating their maturation.