Premium
Comparison of two basophil activation markers CD63 and CD203c in the diagnosis of amoxicillin allergy
Author(s) -
Abuaf N.,
Rostane H.,
Rajoely B.,
Gaouar H.,
Autegarden J. E.,
Leynadier F.,
Girot R.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
clinical and experimental allergy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.462
H-Index - 154
eISSN - 1365-2222
pISSN - 0954-7894
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2008.02960.x
Subject(s) - basophil activation , cd63 , anaphylaxis , medicine , allergy , angioedema , immunology , drug allergy , provocation test , basophil , immunoglobulin e , dermatology , biology , pathology , antibody , microrna , biochemistry , alternative medicine , microvesicles , gene
Summary Background To confirm allergy to β‐lactam (BL), a basophil activation test in flow cytometry based on CD63 up‐regulation was described. CD203c is a more recent basophil activation marker and up to day there is no consensus about which marker is the more sensitive one. CD203c has not yet been evaluated in the diagnosis of BL allergy. Objective The aim of the study was to compare the reliability of CD203c to CD63 for the diagnosis of amoxicillin (AX) allergy, which is nowadays the most frequent BL allergy. Methods Twenty‐seven patients with an immediate positive skin test (ST) to AX, 20 had had anaphylaxis with AX and 7 had urticaria and/or angioedema, were compared with 14 controls with no allergy to BL and to six patients with delayed positive ST to AX. Results In the anaphylaxis group, AX induced up‐regulation of CD203c in the basophils of 12 patients out of 20 (60%) and of CD63 in four patients (20%) ( P <0.02). Two patients out of seven with urticaria or angioedema had a positive result with CD203c and CD63. In patients who had anaphylaxis, ampicillin (AMP) induced CD203c up‐regulation in eight out of 12 (67%) patients tested, and CD63 up‐regulation in 4 out of 12 (33%) (all patients who had anaphylaxis could not be tested with AMP). False‐positive results were observed with CD203c as well as CD63, and for 10 patients indeed this was confirmed by a negative drug provocation test. The origin of conflicting results between CD63 and CD203c might be at least the targeting of basophils based on anti‐IgE labelling. Among IgE + gated cells, by means of CD33, a marker of monocytes, a contamination up to 50% by monocytes was detected. In contrast to CD63, CD203c is an activation marker specific of basophils with a basal low‐level expression in resting basophils. Thus, IgE and CD203c double targeting of basophils avoids the contamination by monocytes. Conclusion CD203c seems to be a more sensitive activation marker of basophils than CD63 for the diagnosis of amoxicillin allergy.