Premium
A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of local nasal immunotherapy in allergic rhinitis to Parietaria pollen
Author(s) -
D'AMATO G.,
LOBEFALO G.,
LICCARDI G.,
CAZZOLA M.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
clinical and experimental allergy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.462
H-Index - 154
eISSN - 1365-2222
pISSN - 0954-7894
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1995.tb01019.x
Subject(s) - medicine , placebo , radioallergosorbent test , immunoglobulin e , hay fever , immunology , allergy , nasal provocation test , allergen , antibody , pathology , alternative medicine
Summary We assessed the efficacy and safety of local nasal immunotherapy (LNIT) using an extract in macronized powder form of Parietaria pollen, a very important allergenic plant in the Mediterranean and other parts of the world. Twenty‐six patients aged 13–37 years, with seasonal allergic rhinitis to this pollen, were enrolled in a double‐blind placebo‐controlled trial, carried out from autumn 1991 to the end of June 1992. They were selected on the basis of a positive skin‐prick test, radioallergosorbent test (RAST) and intranasal challenge to Parietaria antigen. Patients were randomly divided into two groups of 13; the first group was given Parietaria antigen, and the second placebo. We recorded mean weekly symptom scores and drug consumption for 17 weeks during the pollen season in the year 1992, and specific serum‐IgE and IgG levels. Three patients in the active group withdrew from the study because of bronchial symptoms. A significant difference was observed in mean weekly nasal symptom scores, in drug consumption and in specific nasal threshold to Parietaria allergenic extract in the treated and control groups. No difference was observed in serum IgE and IgG levels. Serum IgE levels rose significantly only in the control group after the pollen season. This study indicates that LNIT may be a useful alternative to traditional subcutaneous immunotherapy in patients with allergic rhinitis.