Premium
Feasibility of an obesity intervention for paediatric primary care targeting parenting and children: Helping HAND
Author(s) -
O'Connor T. M.,
Hilmers A.,
Watson K.,
Baranowski T.,
Giardino A. P.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
child: care, health and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.832
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1365-2214
pISSN - 0305-1862
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01344.x
Subject(s) - medicine , intervention (counseling) , attendance , childhood obesity , attrition , body mass index , anthropometry , randomized controlled trial , physical therapy , family medicine , gerontology , nursing , overweight , surgery , dentistry , pathology , economics , economic growth
Background The primary care setting offers the opportunity to reach children and parents to encourage healthy lifestyle behaviours, and improve weight status among children. Objective Test the feasibility of Helping HAND (Healthy Activity and Nutrition Directions), an obesity intervention for 5‐ to 8‐year‐old children in primary care clinics. Methods A randomized controlled pilot study of Helping HAND, a 6‐month intervention, targeted children with body mass index 85–99%tile and their parents. Intervention group attended monthly sessions and self‐selected child behaviours and parenting practices to change. Control group received regular paediatric care and was wait‐listed for Helping HAND. Session completion, participant satisfaction, child anthropometrics, dietary intake, physical activity, TV viewing and behaviour‐specific parenting practices were measured pre and post intervention. Results Forty parent–child dyads enrolled: 82.5% were Hispanic, 80% had a girl and 65% reported income ≤$30 000/year. There was 20% attrition from Helping HAND (attended <4/6 sessions). Families self‐selected 4.35 (SD 1.75) behaviours to target during the 6‐month programme and each of the seven behaviours was selected by 45–80% of the families. There were no between group differences in the child's body mass index z‐score, dietary intake or physical activity post intervention. Intervention group viewed 14.9 (SE 2.3) h/week of TV post intervention versus control group 23.3 (SE 2.4) h/week ( P < 0.05). Conclusion Helping HAND is feasible, due to low attrition, good programme attendance, and clinically relevant improvements in some child and parenting behaviours.