Premium
Improving quality of life of children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review of clinical trials
Author(s) -
Tsoi W. S. E.,
Zhang L. A.,
Wang W. Y.,
Tsang K. L.,
Lo S. K.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
child: care, health and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.832
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1365-2214
pISSN - 0305-1862
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01255.x
Subject(s) - jadad scale , cerebral palsy , psychological intervention , medicine , quality of life (healthcare) , physical therapy , clinical trial , spasticity , physical medicine and rehabilitation , pediatrics , randomized controlled trial , psychiatry , surgery , nursing , cochrane library
Objective To systematically review the impact of different interventions on quality of life (QoL) for children with cerebral palsy. Methods English articles were sought from five major English databases from inceptions until March 2010. Keywords used consisted of four components (and their variants): (i) clinical condition: cerebral palsy; (ii) outcome measures: quality of life, well‐being; (iii) study design: clinical trials; and (iv) target population: people aged 0–18. Results Eight studies satisfied the inclusion criteria, all of which are of good to excellent quality (a Jadad score of 4 or above). The Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory, the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory, the TNO‐AZL Children's Health‐Related Quality of Life and the Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities were used to measure QoL. Significant positive results were reported by two studies using medicinal interventions (diazepam and intrathecal baclofen therapy, effect sizes 5.9, 9.1 respectively) and two studies employing motor control approach training (strength training and exercise training, former effect size being 3.8). Conclusion Current review suggests that positive effect was shown in medicinal and motor control interventions on QoL. However, no single interventional approach can demonstrate a consistent positive impact on QoL across different studies. Future studies are recommended to (i) provide a clear definition of QoL, and investigate the relationship between symptoms' severity and QoL; (ii) measure outcome at different time points to capture real effects of interventions; and (iii) make more use of valid outcome instruments, either self‐report or parent/caregiver proxy reports.