Premium
Cohort differences in the progression of developmental pathways: evidence for period effects on secular trends of violence in males
Author(s) -
Reading Richard
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
child: care, health and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.832
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1365-2214
pISSN - 0305-1862
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2008.00921_6.x
Subject(s) - cohort , demography , odds ratio , poison control , medicine , logistic regression , injury prevention , cohort study , confidence interval , aggression , odds , cohort effect , gerontology , psychiatry , medical emergency , sociology
Cohort differences in the progression of developmental pathways: evidence for period effects on secular trends of violence in males.
Fabio A. , Yuan Z. , Wisniewski S. R. , Henry D. B. , Farrington D. P. , Bridge J. A. & Loeber R.(2008)Injury Prevention,14,311–318.
DOI: 10.1136/ip.2007.017814.Background Rates of violence in the USA have fluctuated widely over the past few decades. Theorists have examined period and cohort effects, but there appear to be no studies examining these effects on progression in developmental pathways towards violence. Objective To assess whether differences in progression among individuals in the Pittsburgh Youth Study are consistent with period or cohort effects. Design Multivariate logistic regression was conducted to examine differences between cohorts in the odds of progressing through the developmental pathway towards violence. Adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. Setting Pittsburgh Pennsylvania, from 1987 to 2000. Subjects Two cohorts of male adolescents from the Pittsburgh Youth Study. The youngest cohort ( n = 503) was followed from median ages 7 to 20, and the oldest cohort ( n = 506) was followed up from median ages 13 to 25. Main outcome measure The odds of progression along a developmental pathway towards violence. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the cohorts in progression from minor aggression to physical fighting (OR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.77–1.65). However, after adjustment for major risk factors, the oldest cohort was significantly more likely to progress from physical fighting to violence (OR = 2.34, 95% CI 1.39–3.92). Conclusions These results provide initial evidence that cohort effects, which would be present early in development, do not contribute significantly to later differences in reported violence and raise the possibility of whether period effects can explain these differences.