Premium
Parenting programme for parents of children at risk of developing conduct disorder: cost effectiveness analysis
Author(s) -
Reading Richard
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
child: care, health and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.832
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1365-2214
pISSN - 0305-1862
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00774_9.x
Subject(s) - confidence interval , cost effectiveness , intervention (counseling) , psychology , randomized controlled trial , medicine , pediatrics , physical therapy , psychiatry , risk analysis (engineering) , surgery
Parenting programme for parents of children at risk of developing conduct disorder: cost effectiveness analysis.
Edwards RT , Céilleachair A , Bywater T , Hughes DA , Hutchings J. (2007)British Medical Journal,334,682–685.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.39126.699421.55Objective To investigate the cost‐effectiveness of a parenting programme. Design An incremental cost‐effectiveness analysis alongside a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a group‐parenting programme delivered through Sure Start in the community. Setting Sure Start areas in north and mid‐Wales. Participants Parents of 116 children aged 36–59 months (87% of the clinical sample) at risk of developing conduct disorders (defined by scoring over the clinical cut‐off on the Eyberg child behaviour inventory). Children were identified by health visitors and recruited by the research team. Intervention The Webster‐Stratton Incredible Years basic parenting programme or a 6‐month waiting list control. Main outcome measure Incremental cost per unit of improvement on the intensity score of the Eyberg child behaviour inventory. Results The bootstrapped incremental cost‐effectiveness ratio point estimate was £73 (€109, $142) per one point improvement on the intensity score (95% confidence interval £42 to £140). It would cost £5486 (€8190, $10 666) to bring the child with the highest intensity score to below the clinical cut‐off point and £1344 (€2006, $2618) to bring the average child in the intervention group within the non‐clinical limits on the intensity score (below 127). For a ceiling ratio of £100 (€149, $194) per point increase in intensity score, there is an 83.9% chance of the intervention being cost‐effective. The mean cost per child attending the parenting group was £1934 (€2887, $3760) for eight children and £1289 (€1924, $2506) for 12 children, including initial costs and materials for training group leaders. When we categorized the sample into relatively mild, moderate and severe behaviour groups based on intensity scores at baseline, the intervention seemed more cost‐effective in those with the highest risk of developing conduct disorder. Conclusion This parenting programme improves child behaviour as measured by the intensity score of the Eyberg child behaviour inventory at a relatively low cost and was cost‐effective compared with the waiting list control. This parenting programme involves modest costs and demonstrates strong clinical effect, suggesting it would represent good value for money for public spending.