Premium
Why is compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia so hard? A qualitative study
Author(s) -
Reading Richard
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
child: care, health and development
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.832
H-Index - 82
eISSN - 1365-2214
pISSN - 0305-1862
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2006.00674_7.x
Subject(s) - credibility , compliance (psychology) , qualitative research , distress , psychological intervention , medicine , perception , psychology , nursing , clinical psychology , social psychology , sociology , political science , law , social science , neuroscience
Why is compliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia so hard? A qualitative study.
Dixon‐Woods , M. , Awan , M. & Gottlob , I.(2006)Archives of Disease in Childhood,91,491–494.Objective To explore parents’ perceptions and experiences of occlusion (patching) therapy for treatment of amblyopia in children. Methods Qualitative study involving semi‐structured interviews with 25 families of a child with amblyopia being treated at a specialist clinic. Interviews were tape‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis was based on the constant comparative method, assisted by qualitative analysis software. Results Parents of children prescribed patching treatment found themselves obliged to manage the treatment. This involved dilemmas and tensions, with many parents describing children’s distress, particularly in the early stages of patching treatment. Parents were highly sensitive to the credibility of the treatment, but were sometimes confused by information given in the clinic or did not see clinic staff as authoritative. There was evidence that parents were likely to abandon or modify treatment if no improvement could be detected or if the child continued to suffer socially or educationally. Parents described a range of strategies for facilitating patching, including explanation; normalization; rewards; customizing the patch; establishing a routine; and enlisting the help of others. Whatever their practices in relation to patching, parents were keen to defend their behaviour as that of a ‘good parent’. Conclusions Interventions that aim to improve compliance should take account of the difficulties and tensions experienced by parents, rather than simply treating non‐compliance as resulting from information deficits. Practical support that builds on strategies described by parents is likely to be of benefit.