Open AccessComparative Analysis of Different Approaches to Investigate Cell Kinetics
Author(s) -
Silvestrini R.,
Costa A.,
Veneroni S.,
Bino G.,
Persici P.
Publication year - 1988
Publication title -
cell proliferation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.647
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1365-2184
pISSN - 0960-7722
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1988.tb00778.x
Subject(s) - bromodeoxyuridine , monoclonal antibody , thymidine , microbiology and biotechnology , lymph node , monoclonal , kinetics , cell cycle , chemistry , biology , cell growth , andrology , cell , immunology , antibody , medicine , dna , biochemistry , physics , quantum mechanics
. The potential of different methods to investigate proliferative activity of cell populations was analysed for non‐Hodgkin's lymphomas. Cells in S phase and all cycling cells were determined on cell suspensions obtained from fresh lymph node material by [ 3 H]‐thymidine autoradiography ([ 3 H]TdR LI), a monoclonal antibody to bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU LI), and the monoclonal antibody Ki67. A good correlation was observed between the values of [ 3 H]TdR LI and BrdU LI ( r s = 0.90; P < 0.01), [ 3 H]TdR LI and S phase ( r s = 0.62; P < 0.01) and [ 3 H]TdR LI and Ki67 ( r s = 0.64; P < 0.01) in individual lymphomas. Using the median values obtained from the different approaches as cut‐off points to define slowly and rapidly proliferating tumours, the best agreement was observed between [ 3 H]TdR LI and BrdU LI (91%) and poorer agreements, even though statistically significant, were observed between [ 3 H]TdR LI and S phase (73%) or Ki67 (76%). In conclusion, the kinetic information derived from different approaches was more or less concordant and newly proposed approaches should be directly and carefully verified for their prognostic relevance before using them as alternatives to conventional methods.