z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
THE ACTION OF HYDROXYUREA ON MOUSE L‐CELLS *
Author(s) -
Bacchetti S.,
Whitmore G. F.
Publication year - 1969
Publication title -
cell proliferation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.647
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1365-2184
pISSN - 0960-7722
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1969.tb00230.x
Subject(s) - dna synthesis , mitosis , biology , dna , cell cycle , deoxyribonucleotides , cell division , microbiology and biotechnology , biochemistry , pharmacology , chemistry , cell , nucleotide , gene
The toxic and inhibitory properties of hydroxyurea (HU) have been studied in asynchronous and synchronized populations of mouse L‐cells. Hydroxyurea is a potent growth inhibitor and appears to be specifically lethal for cells which are in the early part of S phase at the time the compound is introduced. Cells in late S phase, G 2 , mitosis and G 1 appear to progress normally around the cycle in the presence of the compound until they reach the G 1 /S boundary. There are indications that at least some G 1 cells are able to enter the S phase even in the presence of the drug; however their flow into S is much slower than that of control cells and therefore they are killed at a slow rate. Upon prolonged exposure to the drug a second phase of more rapid killing is observed, beginning at about the time division would occur in uninhibited cells. Hydroxyurea exhibits a rapid and marked inhibition on DNA synthesis but its effect on RNA synthesis is much less pronounced and may be a consequence of the inhibition of DNA synthesis. The effects of hydroxyurea on cell viability and DNA synthesis can be partially prevented by the addition of deoxyribonucleosides which in sufficient concentration appear to compete temporarily with the drug. The fact that the protection is only temporary would appear to rule out the hypothesis that the primary mode of action of the drug is the inhibition of the reduction which converts ribonucleotides to deoxyribonucleotides. The data presented in this communication taken together with observations of other workers would appear to suggest that the effect of the drug may be directly on the DNA molecule.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here