Premium
A founder ectodysplasin A receptor ( EDAR ) mutation results in a high frequency of the autosomal recessive form of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia in India
Author(s) -
Bashyam M.D.,
Chaudhary A.K.,
Reddy E.C.,
Reddy V.,
Acharya V.,
Nagarajaram H.A.,
Devi A.R.R.,
Bashyam L.,
Dalal A.B.,
Gupta N.,
Kabra M.,
Agarwal M.,
Phadke S.R.,
Tainwala R.,
Kumar R.,
Hariharan S.V.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
british journal of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.304
H-Index - 179
eISSN - 1365-2133
pISSN - 0007-0963
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2011.10707.x
Subject(s) - hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia , genetics , biology , x linked recessive inheritance , mutation , missense mutation , nonsense mutation , ectodermal dysplasia , gene , x chromosome
Summary Background Hypohidrotic/anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) is a rare Mendelian disorder affecting ectodermal tissues. The disease is primarily caused by inactivation of any one of three genes, namely ectodysplasin A1 ( EDA‐A1 ), which encodes a ligand belonging to the tumour necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily; ectodysplasin A receptor ( EDAR ), encoding the EDA‐A1 receptor and ectodysplasin A receptor‐associated death domain ( EDARADD ), encoding an adaptor protein. X‐linked recessive ( EDA‐A1 ), the predominant form of HED, as well as autosomal recessive and dominant ( EDAR and EDARADD ) inheritance patterns have been identified in affected families. Objectives To determine the common genes causing HED in India. Methods We performed mutation analysis on 26 HED families from India (including 30 patients). In addition, we carried out sequence and structural analysis of missense/nonsense and insertion/deletion mutations. Results Among the 26 families analysed, disease‐causing EDAR mutations were identified in 12 (46%) while EDA‐A1 mutations were detected in 11 (42%). Four novel mutations in EDAR and five in EDA‐A1 were identified. More importantly, a possible founder EDAR mutation, namely c.1144G>A, was identified in five independent families, thus accounting for about one‐fifth of affected families in whom mutation was detected. A majority of EDA‐A1 mutations localized to the TNF‐like domain while the location of EDAR mutations was more widespread. Conclusions This is the first report of a founder EDAR mutation and of a significantly high frequency of autosomal recessive HED.