Premium
Pulsed intravenous cyclophosphamide and methylprednisolone therapy in refractory pemphigus
Author(s) -
Saha M.,
Powell AM.,
Bhogal B.,
Black M.M.,
Groves R.W.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
british journal of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.304
H-Index - 179
eISSN - 1365-2133
pISSN - 0007-0963
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09590.x
Subject(s) - medicine , prednisolone , methylprednisolone , cyclophosphamide , azathioprine , pemphigus , refractory (planetary science) , immunosuppression , gastroenterology , corticosteroid , mizoribine , surgery , chemotherapy , immunology , disease , physics , astrobiology
Summary Background Pemphigus is a rare autoimmune blistering disorder. The mainstay of current treatment is high‐dose oral corticosteroid therapy in combination with a steroid‐sparing agent. Adjuvant therapy is important for disease control and to reduce the iatrogenic effects of oral prednisolone. Pulsed therapy with intravenous methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide (PPC) has been shown to be an effective treatment but there are currently few data on its use in patients who have failed to respond to conventional immunosuppression. Objectives To report the clinical and immunological responses of 21 patients with pemphigus refractory to prednisolone and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil treated in our department with a standard protocol of monthly PPC. Methods Patients with pemphigus were identified who had undergone PPC therapy during the period between 1997 and 2006. Initial clinical severity and response to treatment was assessed. In addition, change in intercellular antibody titres and desmoglein 1 and 3 antibodies to PPC therapy was also recorded. Results Of the 21 patients treated, seven had an excellent response, two a good response, five a moderate response, six a minimal response and one patient had no clinical response. Four patients achieved complete clinical remission and the number of pulses for these patients varied between 11 and 22. We observed significant reductions in indirect immunofluorescence titres for normal human skin substrate ( P = 0·0078) and antidesmoglein 1 and 3 autoantibody levels ( P = 0·007 and P = 0·0085, respectively) from pre‐PPC therapy to 1 year after the last pulse. All patients were able to reduce their prednisolone dose from a pre‐pulsing median dose of 40–10 mg at the last pulse with a median dose reduction of 66% ( P < 0·001). The most common adverse effect was transient lymphopenia (12 patients); nonlife‐threatening sepsis (seven patients) and premature ovarian failure (two patients) also occurred. Conclusions PPC can be an effective treatment for refractory pemphigus but its adverse effects should be considered prior to therapy and closely monitored in patients on treatment.