Premium
First report on autochthonous urease‐positive Trichophyton rubrum ( T. raubitschekii ) from South‐east Europe
Author(s) -
Arabatzis M.,
Velegraki A.,
Kantardjiev T.,
Stavrakieva V.,
Rigopoulos D.,
Katsambas A.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
british journal of dermatology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.304
H-Index - 179
eISSN - 1365-2133
pISSN - 0007-0963
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06615.x
Subject(s) - trichophyton rubrum , microbiology and biotechnology , urease , trichophyton , biology , medicine , enzyme , biochemistry , antifungal
Summary Background Trichophyton raubitschekii is a dermatophyte belonging to the T. rubrum complex and is differentiated principally by its positive urease activity and production of profuse macroconidia and microconidia in culture. It is classically isolated from African, South‐east Asian and Australian aboriginal patients with tinea corporis or tinea cruris. Objectives This study was undertaken to screen Greek and Bulgarian clinical isolates identified as T. rubrum for T. raubitschekii and to delineate these strains by two molecular methods used for the first time in T. rubrum epidemiological studies. Methods Ninety‐five Greek and 10 Bulgarian strains, originating from various body sites, initially identified as T. rubrum, were screened for urease activity. The biochemical properties and morphology of the urease‐positive strains were determined. Strains were delineated with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐ribotyping amplifying repeat elements of the intergenic spacer region and by PCR fingerprinting. Results Five Greek and one Bulgarian T. raubitschekii strains were identified comprising isolates from patients with tinea manuum (one), tinea corporis (one), tinea cruris (one) and tinea unguium (three). Only one strain had the classical T. raubitschekii microscopic morphology, whereas the remaining five presented a dominant arthroconidial phenotype. Both typing methods clustered all T. raubitschekii and T. rubrum isolates together in the same group, indicating strain homogeneity in the genetic regions examined . Conclusions The reported isolation of T. raubitschekii in the Balkan and South‐eastern Mediterranean regions extends the geographical distribution of this species. As the more primitive T. raubitschekii probably represents the parental population of T. rubrum , the Greek and Bulgarian T. raubitschekii strains could represent a remnant of the T. rubrum spread that took place after the First World War, rather than being a recent epidemiological event.