Premium
Effects of fesoterodine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy volunteers
Author(s) -
Malhotra Bimal,
Alvey Christine,
Gong Jason,
Li Xiaoxi,
Duczynski Gregory,
Gandelman Kuan
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2011.03989.x
Subject(s) - pharmacodynamics , pharmacokinetics , warfarin , pharmacology , medicine , atrial fibrillation
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Drug–drug interactions with warfarin are common with potentially harmful consequences. Preclinical in vitro studies suggest that fesoterodine or 5‐hydroxymethyl tolterodine are not likely to affect warfarin metabolism, but a lack of interaction has not been demonstrated in a clinical study. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • This study shows that the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin 25 mg in healthy adults are unaffected by fesoterodine 8 mg, and that co‐administration of warfarin 25 mg and fesoterodine 8 mg is safe and well tolerated. AIMS To confirm the lack of an interaction of fesoterodine 8 mg with warfarin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in healthy adults. METHODS In this open‐label, two‐treatment, crossover study, subjects ( n = 14) aged 20–41 years with normal prothrombin time (PT) and International Normalized Ratio (INR) were randomized to receive a single dose of warfarin 25 mg alone in one period and fesoterodine 8 mg once daily on days 1–9 with a single dose of warfarin 25 mg co‐administered on day 3 in the other period. There was a 10‐day washout between treatments. Pharmacokinetic endpoints were area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0,∞)), maximum plasma concentration ( C max ), AUC from time 0 to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0,last)), time to C max ( t max ), and half‐life ( t 1/2 ) for S‐ and R‐warfarin. Pharmacodynamic endpoints were area under the INR‐time curve (AUC INR ), maximum INR (INR max ), area under the PT‐time curve (AUC PT ) and maximum PT (PT max ). RESULTS Across all pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparisons, the point estimates of treatment ratio (warfarin co‐administered with fesoterodine vs. warfarin alone) were 92–100%. The 90% confidence intervals for the ratios of the adjusted geometric means were contained within (80%, 125%). There were no clinically relevant changes in laboratory tests, vital signs or ECG recordings. CONCLUSIONS The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin 25 mg in healthy adults are unaffected by fesoterodine 8 mg. Concomitant administration of fesoterodine and warfarin was well tolerated.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom