Premium
Correlates of (inappropriate) benzodiazepine use: the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA)
Author(s) -
Manthey Leonie,
van Veen Tineke,
Giltay Erik J.,
Stoop José E.,
Neven Arie Knuistingh,
Penninx Brenda W. J. H.,
Zitman Frans G.
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03818.x
Subject(s) - anxiety , medicine , depression (economics) , psychiatry , benzodiazepine , comorbidity , receptor , economics , macroeconomics
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Benzodiazepines (BZDs) are not only used as a treatment for anxiety and depression (besides epilepsy), but also inappropriately for chronic insomnia, pain, somatic illnesses [1] and uncontrollable stress. • In spite of lack of effectiveness and adverse health consequences in chronic BZD use, over 50% are long‐term users. • The relative importance of sociodemographic, psychological and physical determinants of BZD use in general and inappropriate use has never been investigated in a comprehensive, multivariable model. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • BZDs were used by a considerable proportion of the NESDA participants and BZD use was rarely in accordance with all guidelines, mainly because of an extended duration of use. • Mentally or physically vulnerable subjects were most likely to use BZDs as well as to use it inappropriately. • Clinicians should be vigilant when initiating BZD prescriptions for vulnerable subjects, particularly when patients are chronically ill and old, as those subjects are at high risk of inappropriate use. AIM Results on determinants of benzodiazepine (BZD) use in general and inappropriate use were inconsistent and mostly univariate. The relative importance of sociodemographic, psychological and physical determinants has never been investigated in a comprehensive, multivariate model. METHODS We included 429 BZD users and 2423 non‐users from the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety (NESDA) in order to investigate sociodemographic, psychological and physical determinants of BZD use and inappropriate use by logistic and linear regression analyses. RESULTS BZDs were used by a considerable proportion of the 2852 NESDA participants (15.0%). BZD use was independently associated with older age, singleness, unemployment, treatment in secondary care, higher medical consumption (more severe) anxiety, depression (OR [95% CI]= 1.95 [1.29, 2.93]), comorbidity, insomnia, SSRI (OR [95% CI]= 2.05 [1.55, 2.70]), TCA and other antidepressant (OR [95% CI]= 2.44 [1.64, 3.62]) use. Overall, BZD use was rarely in accordance with all guidelines, mainly because most users (82.5%) exceeded the recommended duration of safe use. Inappropriate use was independently associated with older age (β= 0.130) and chronic illnesses (β= 0.120). Higher scores on agreeableness were associated with less inappropriate use. CONCLUSIONS Mentally or physically vulnerable subjects were most likely to use BZDs. The most vulnerable (i.e. the old and physically ill) BZD users were at highest risk of inappropriate BZD use. Without further evidence of the effectiveness of BZDs in long‐term use, caution in initiating BZD prescriptions is recommended, particularly when patients are chronically ill and old, as those are most likely to display inappropriate use.