Premium
The use of gastrointestinal intubation studies for controlled release development
Author(s) -
Sutton Steven C.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2009.03432.x
Subject(s) - medicine , intubation , gastrointestinal tract , anesthesia , pharmacology
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT • Regional gastrointestinal absorption and toleration studies to support controlled release (CR) development have been limited to naso‐intubation and telemetric capsule methods. • The use of intubation for this purpose has been individually reported for single CR candidates; viz rivastigmine, and UK‐338,003. • Nyberg et al . have recently published a report on 13 Phase I studies using a telemetric capsule. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS • When the highest ethical standards were employed in the recruitment, treatment, compensation and follow‐up care given to all participants, subjects were easily recruited, and clinical intubation studies were uncomplicated to complete. • From the eight Phase I studies, improved methods are proposed for unequivocal interpretation of the results. • When required, clinical intubation studies are uniquely designed to aid in the CR development of drug candidates. AIMS This review describes clinical results of gastrointestinal intubation studies of eight controlled release (CR) candidates under development during the 1990s and offers suggestions for determining why, when and how to conduct human intubation studies. METHODS Experience with the administration of the following eight compounds to various regions of the gastrointestinal tract is described: CJ‐13,610, CP‐195,543, CP‐331,684, CP‐409,092, CP‐424,391, azithromycin, sertraline, and trovafloxacin. Also included are human pharmacokinetic studies with prototype CR dosage forms for CJ‐13,610 and CP‐424,391. RESULTS Intubation studies, while appearing invasive, are safe and not unpleasant procedures that have been found to be valuable in the development of CR formulations. CONCLUSIONS The following recommendations are made regarding intubation studies: (i) no intubation study is recommended for compounds with high permeability, since these compounds are likely to be well absorbed from the colon; (ii) compounds with moderate permeability may require an intubation study if the dog colon and in silico models predict a marginally acceptable CR concentration–time profile; (iii) use a dose that approximates 1 h of the intended CR delivery rate; (iv) use the smallest volume possible; (v) define and record tubing placement; (vi) use a thermodynamically stable solution or/and suspension.