Premium
Effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of exenatide
Author(s) -
Linnebjerg Helle,
Kothare Prajakti A.,
Park Soomin,
Mace Kenneth,
Reddy Shobha,
Mitchell Malcolm,
Lins Robert
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
british journal of clinical pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.216
H-Index - 146
eISSN - 1365-2125
pISSN - 0306-5251
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2007.02890.x
Subject(s) - exenatide , tolerability , medicine , pharmacokinetics , renal function , urology , nausea , type 2 diabetes , kidney disease , diabetes mellitus , vomiting , pharmacology , gastroenterology , adverse effect , endocrinology
What is already known about this subject • Nonclinical studies have shown that exenatide is primarily cleared by the renal system. • It was not known to what degree the clinical pharmacokinetics and tolerability would be affected by increasing renal impairment (RI). What this study adds • Patients with mild to moderate RI adequately tolerate current therapeutic doses of exenatide. • However, exenatide is not recommended in patients with severe RI or end‐stage renal disease. Aims To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of a single exenatide dose in patients with renal impairment (RI). Methods Exenatide (5 or 10 µg) was injected subcutaneously in 31 subjects (one with Type 2 diabetes) stratified by renal function [Cockcroft–Gault creatinine clearance (CrCL), number of subjects]: normal (>80 ml min −1 , n = 8), mild RI (51–80 ml min −1 , n = 8), moderate RI (31–50 ml min −1 , n = 7) or end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring haemodialysis ( n = 8). PK data were combined with four previous single‐dose studies in patients with Type 2 diabetes to explore the relationship of exenatide clearance (CLp/F) and CrCL. Results Mean half‐life for healthy, mild RI, moderate RI and ESRD groups were 1.5, 2.1, 3.2 and 6.0 h, respectively. After combining data from multiple studies, least squares geometric means for CLp/F in subjects with normal renal function, mild RI, moderate RI and ESRD were 8.14, 5.19, 7.11 and 1.3 l h −1 , respectively. Exenatide was generally well tolerated in the mild and moderate RI groups, but not in subjects with ESRD due to nausea and vomiting. Simulations of exenatide plasma concentrations also suggest patients with ESRD should have a propensity for poor tolerability at the lowest available therapeutic dosage (5 µg q.d.). Conclusions Since tolerability and PK changes were considered clinically acceptable in patients with mild to moderate RI, it would be appropriate to administer exenatide to these patients without dosage adjustment. However, poor tolerability and significant changes in PK make the currently available therapeutic doses (5 and 10 µg) unsuitable in severe RI or ESRD.