Premium
Limited evidence for genetic variation for resistance to the white spot syndrome virus in Indian populations of Penaeus monodon
Author(s) -
Hayes Ben J,
Gitterle Thomas,
Gopikrishna Gopalapillay,
Gopal Chavali,
Krishna Gopal,
Jahageerdar Shrivinas,
Lozano Carlos,
Alavandi Shankar,
Paulpandi Sivagnanam,
Ravichandran Pitchaiyappan,
Rye Morten
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
aquaculture research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.646
H-Index - 89
eISSN - 1365-2109
pISSN - 1355-557X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02611.x
Subject(s) - penaeus monodon , biology , white spot syndrome , heritability , shrimp , genetic variation , selective breeding , population , genetics , zoology , fishery , gene , demography , sociology
There has been a highly detrimental impact of the white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) on black tiger shrimp ( Penaeus monodon ) aquaculture in India. Currently, no cost‐effective measures are available for controlling the disease. One alternative is to improve WSSV resistance through a selective breeding programme for disease‐resistant shrimp, provided that genetic variation exists for this trait. The aim of this study was to evaluate the evidence for genetic variation in resistance to WSSV in P. monodon sourced from Indian populations. Post‐larval shrimp ( n =1950) from 54 full‐sibling families were challenged with WSSV using WSSV‐infected mince meat. The heritability was estimated using four different statistical models fitted to the resulting time to death data, including two linear models and two Weibull proportional hazard frailty models. None of the estimated heritabilities were significantly different from zero. We suggest three possible explanations for these results: there actually is very little variation between P. monodon in WSSV resistance and all individuals are highly susceptible to the disease; there is genetic variation in resistance to WSSV in P. monodon but we did not find it in our experiment because the level of challenge in the experiment was too high to allow genetic differences to be expressed; the variation is due to mutations conferring resistance, which are at a low frequency in the population, and we did not sample a broad enough genetic base to capture these mutations.