Premium
Ultrasound vs nerve stimulation multiple injection technique for posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block
Author(s) -
Danelli G.,
Fanelli A.,
Ghisi D.,
Moschini E.,
Rossi M.,
Ortu A.,
Baciarello M.,
Fanelli G.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.05915.x
Subject(s) - medicine , ropivacaine , sciatic nerve , anesthesia , ultrasound , nerve block , nerve stimulation , motor block , fentanyl , stimulation , surgery , bupivacaine , radiology
Summary In this prospective, randomised, observer‐blinded study we evaluated whether ultrasound guidance can shorten the onset time of popliteal sciatic nerve block as compared to nerve stimulation with a multiple injection technique. Forty‐four ASA I–III patients undergoing posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block with 20 ml of 0.75% ropivacaine were randomly allocated to nerve stimulation or ultrasound guided nerve block. A blinded observer recorded onset of sensory and motor blocks, success rates, the need for fentanyl intra‐operatively, the requirement for general anaesthesia, procedure‐related pain, patient satisfaction and side‐effects. Onset times for sensory and motor blocks were comparable. The success rate was 100% for ultrasound guided vs 82% for nerve stimulation (p = 0.116). Ultrasound guidance reduced needle redirections (p = 0.01), were associated with less procedural pain (p = 0.002) and required less time to perform (p = 0.002). Ultrasound guidance reduced the time needed for block performance and procedural pain.