Premium
Detection of inner tube defects in co‐axial circle and Bain breathing systems: a comparison of occlusion and Pethick tests
Author(s) -
Szypula K. A.,
Ip J. K.,
Bogod D.,
Yentis S. M.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05568.x
Subject(s) - occlusion , medicine , breathing , tube (container) , orthodontics , nuclear medicine , anatomy , anesthesia , surgery , composite material , materials science
Summary The performance of the occlusion and Pethick tests in detecting faulty inner tubes in co‐axial circle and Bain systems was compared. Twelve co‐axial circle and 12 Bain anaesthetic breathing systems were tested using the occlusion and the Pethick tests. For each system, three tubes were intact, and the remaining nine had a defect deliberately created in the inner tube (three proximal, three middle and three distal). The investigators were blinded to which of the tubes were defective, and to each other’s results. The results showed 100% specificity for both tests. The sensitivity of the occlusion test for detecting faulty breathing systems was found to be good (98%). Our results suggest that the occlusion test should be performed in preference to the Pethick test when testing co‐axial circle and Bain systems.