Premium
Continuous cardiac output measurement: arterial pressure analysis versus thermodilution technique during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass
Author(s) -
Lorsomradee S.,
Lorsomradee S. R.,
Cromheecke S.,
De Hert S. G.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05194.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cardiac output , cardiopulmonary bypass , cardiac surgery , anesthesia , phenylephrine , cardiology , mean arterial pressure , blood pressure , hemodynamics , heart rate
Summary This study compared cardiac output measured with an arterial pressure‐based cardiac output measurement system and a thermodilution cardiac output measurement system. We studied 36 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Simultaneous arterial pressure‐based and thermodilution cardiac output measurements were compared before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, and after phenylephrine administration. Bland‐Altman analysis showed good overall agreement between the two methods. Bias (limits of agreement) before and after cardiopulmonary bypass were − 0.21 (− 2.97–2.55) l.min −1 and 0.01 (− 3.79–3.81) l.min −1 , respectively. Phenylephrine administration decreased thermodilution cardiac output by a mean (SD) of 11 (16)% and increased arterial pressure‐based cardiac output by 55 (34)%. We conclude that arterial pressure‐based cardiac output and thermodilution cardiac output measurement systems yield comparable results during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. However, after phenylephrine administration, the two measurement systems provided opposing results.