Premium
A national survey of epidural use and management in elderly patients undergoing elective and emergency laparotomy
Author(s) -
Walton B.,
Farrow C.,
Cook T. M.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2006.04585.x
Subject(s) - medicine , laparotomy , epidural block , anesthesia , local anaesthetic , opioid , abdominal surgery , surgery , receptor
Summary A postal questionnaire was sent to anaesthetic clinical tutors in the United Kingdom describing two hypothetical 75‐year‐old patients requiring abdominal surgery. Patient 1 (ASA 2) required elective anterior resection and patient 2 (ASA 3–4) required emergency laparotomy. There was a 65% response rate. For patient 1, 98.5% of respondents would insert an epidural, 93% inserting this awake and 50% placing it in the high‐mid thoracic region. All respondents would use local anaesthesia (concentration varied four‐fold) and 62% would use opioids. All respondents would place the epidural pre‐operatively; although 36% would administer the epidural block pre‐operatively and 3% postoperatively. For patient 2, 70% of respondents would insert an epidural (p < 0.0001), drug administration would be more frequently delayed until postoperatively (13%); p = 0.0005) and epidural opioid use decreased (57%); p = n/s. Epidural insertion influenced the postoperative destination in 42% of departments. Use of a critical care facility was anticipated for more than half of these patients; 60% reported difficulty accessing critical care beds.