z-logo
Premium
A comparison of three variable performance devices for postoperative oxygen therapy
Author(s) -
McBRIEN M. E.,
SELLERS W. F. S.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb15096.x
Subject(s) - medicine , catheter , anesthesia , collar , surgery , tube (container) , mechanical engineering , engineering
Summary Eleven patients in the intensive care unit following major abdominal surgery with a nasogastric tube in situ and receiving oxygen via facemask were allocated to receive in a random sequence oxygen at 4l.min ‐1 via a Hudson mask, nasal cannulae or a nasal catheter with foam collar at the distal end. A significantly greater Pao 2 was achieved using both the nasal catheter with foam collar (p < 0.01) and Hudson mask (p < 0.05) compared to the nasal cannulae. There were no significant differences in the PacO 2 or SpO 2 values obtained between the devices. In the majority of postoperative patients in whom a variable performance device is indicated, nasal devices appear preferable in terms of patient comfort and compliance. The nasal catheter with foam collar produced a significantly greater PaQ 2 than nasal cannulae in patients with a nasogastric tube in situ.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here