Premium
A low‐flow to‐and‐fro system
Author(s) -
KADIM M. Y.,
LOCKWOOD G. G.,
CHAKRABARTI M. K.,
WHITWAM J. G.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09856.x
Subject(s) - fresh gas flow , tidal volume , volume (thermodynamics) , tube (container) , medicine , volumetric flow rate , maximum flow problem , ventilation (architecture) , flow (mathematics) , anesthesia , breathing , mechanics , respiratory system , materials science , anatomy , composite material , thermodynamics , physics , sevoflurane , mathematical optimization , mathematics
Summary The insertion of a long deadspace tube between an anaesthetic breathing system and a ventilator produces only imperfect separation of the breathing system gas from the driving gas. This laboratory study has investigated different connecting tubes to establish the maximum tidal volume possible before ventilator gas contaminates the gas in a low‐flow to‐and‐fro system (fresh gas flow 1 litre/minute). A larger volume tube enables the use of larger tidal volumes, and plastic corrugated tubes are slightly better than black rubber corrugated tubes in this respect. The maximum tidal volume possible without contamination decreases as ventilatory rate increases, but the maximum minute volume is increased. A 22 mm plastic corrugated tube of internal volume 1.5 litres should be adequate for clinical use with the to‐and‐fro system described in this study at afresh gas flow of 1 litre/minute.