Premium
Meta‐analysis: nitroglycerin for prevention of post‐ERCP pancreatitis
Author(s) -
BANG U. C.,
NØJGAARD C.,
ANDERSEN P. K.,
MATZEN P.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
alimentary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.308
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1365-2036
pISSN - 0269-2813
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03978.x
Subject(s) - medicine , isosorbide dinitrate , pancreatitis , acute pancreatitis , nitroglycerin (drug) , number needed to treat , meta analysis , relative risk , cochrane library , randomized controlled trial , anesthesia , gastroenterology , confidence interval
Summary Background Acute pancreatitis after ERCP is a severe side effect. Aim To evaluate the preventive effect of nitroglycerin on post‐ERCP pancreatitis by a meta‐analysis of randomized clinical studies. Methods We searched on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library and all abstracts presented at Digestive Disease Week and United European Gastrointestinal Week from 2004 to 2008. We used the MeSH terms ‘pancreatitis’ together (AND) with the terms: ‘glyceryl trinitrate’, ‘glyceryl dinitrate’, ‘isosorbide dinitrate’ or ‘nitroglycerin’. Results Five clinical studies evaluating the incidence of post‐ERCP pancreatitis after administration of nitroglycerin were identified. Meta‐analysis including all five studies showed a relative risk (RR) of 0.61 (95% CI; 0.44, 0.86) with the number needed to treat (NNT) of 26 (95% CI: 16, 82). Three studies evaluated nitroglycerin administered by a dermal patch reaching together an RR of 0.66 (95% CI; 0.43, 1.01). The use of nitroglycerin is associated with a significantly increased risk of hypotension (RR 2.25) and headache (RR 3.64). No difference in mortality was observed. Conclusions Overall, our meta‐analysis supports the use of nitroglycerin in the prevention of post‐ERCP pancreatitis, but administration of nitroglycerin by the dermal route, which is the preferred route of administration, did not reach statistical significance.