Premium
Meta‐analysis: Saccharomyces boulardii for treating acute diarrhoea in children
Author(s) -
SZAJEWSKA H.,
SKÓRKA A.,
DYLAG M.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
alimentary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.308
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1365-2036
pISSN - 0269-2813
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2006.03202.x
Subject(s) - saccharomyces boulardii , medicine , randomized controlled trial , probiotic , diarrhea , cochrane library , meta analysis , number needed to treat , cinahl , gastroenterology , relative risk , confidence interval , psychological intervention , genetics , bacteria , biology , psychiatry
Summary Background Saccharomyces boulardii is a non‐pathogenic probiotic yeast considered useful against enteropathogens. Aim To assess the effectiveness of S. boulardii in treating acute infectious diarrhoea in children. Methods The following electronic databases were searched through August 2006 for studies relevant to acute infectious diarrhoea and S. boulardii : MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and The Cochrane Library; additional references were obtained from reviewed articles. Only randomized‐controlled trials were included. Results Five randomized‐controlled trials (619 participants) met the inclusion criteria. Combined data from four randomized‐controlled trials showed that S. boulardii significantly reduced the duration of diarrhoea compared with control. The pooled weighted mean difference was −1.1 days (95% CI: −1.3 to −0.8) with a fixed model and remained significant in a random effect model. Saccharomyces boulardii significantly reduced the risk of diarrhoea on days 3, 6 and 7. Also the risk of diarrhoea lasting >7 days was significantly reduced in the S. boulardii group vs. control group (1 RCT, n = 88, RR 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08–0.83; NNT 5, 95% CI: 3–20). Conclusions There exists a moderate clinical benefit of S. boulardii therapy in otherwise healthy infants and children with acute gastroenteritis, mainly a shorter duration of diarrhoea. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to methodological limitations of the included studies.