z-logo
Premium
Hepatic steatosis in chronic hepatitis C: impact on response to anti‐viral treatment with peg‐interferon and ribavirin
Author(s) -
GUIDI M.,
MURATORI P.,
GRANITO A.,
MURATORI L.,
PAPPAS G.,
LENZI M.,
BIANCHI F. B.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
alimentary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.308
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1365-2036
pISSN - 0269-2813
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02679.x
Subject(s) - steatosis , ribavirin , medicine , gastroenterology , alanine transaminase , transaminase , fibrosis , hepatitis c , pegylated interferon , aspartate transaminase , elevated transaminases , viral hepatitis , hepatitis c virus , immunology , virus , biology , alkaline phosphatase , enzyme , biochemistry
Summary Background:  There is increasing evidence that hepatic steatosis contributes to the progression of liver fibrosis, whereas its impact on the efficacy of anti‐viral treatment is still under investigation. Aim:  To evaluate the effect of steatosis on the outcome of combined anti‐viral treatment. Methods:  We studied 102 consecutive naive patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving combined anti‐viral therapy (peg‐interferon α ‐2b and ribavirin). Results:  Fifty (49%) of 102 patients had evidence of hepatic steatosis (29 grade 1, 16 grade 2 and 5 grade 3). Sustained virological response was similar in patients with and without steatosis (58% vs. 56%); moreover, the grade of steatosis did not affect the rate of sustained virological response (grade 1: 58%, grade 2: 56% and grade 3: 60%). Patients with steatosis had significantly higher serum levels of aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase and γ ‐glutamyltransferase ( P  = 0.007, 0.004 and 0.03, respectively), higher histological activity ( P  = 0.03), more advanced stage of fibrosis ( P  = 0.0394) and more often hepatitis C virus genotype 3 ( P  = 0.04). Conclusions:  Our findings suggest that hepatic steatosis in chronic hepatitis C, irrespective of its grade, is not a negative prognostic factor of response to combined anti‐viral therapy, even when the histological and biochemical profile of the disease is more aggressive.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here