Premium
Ethnic differences in use value and use patterns of baobab ( Adansonia digitata L.) in northern Benin
Author(s) -
De Caluwé E.,
De Smedt S.,
Assogbadjo A. E.,
Samson R.,
Sinsin B.,
Van Damme P.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
african journal of ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.499
H-Index - 54
eISSN - 1365-2028
pISSN - 0141-6707
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2028.2008.01023.x
Subject(s) - ethnobotany , adansonia digitata , ethnic group , traditional knowledge , geography , handicraft , socioeconomics , biology , sociology , anthropology , botany , medicinal plants , indigenous , ecology , archaeology
The aim of this study was to combine qualitative and quantitative tools to evidence ethnic differences in use value and use patterns of baobab for the rural populations of northern Benin. The study was carried out in the municipalities of Boukoumbé and Karimama, focusing on Ottamari and Dendi ethnic groups, respectively, who have good knowledge on baobab uses. Ethnobotanical data were gathered through semi‐structured individual interviews and processed by quantitative (multiple use curve, use value and fidelity level) and qualitative (flow chart) analytical and ethnobotanical methods. Leaves, fruit pulp and seeds of baobab were shown to be well‐known for several food uses and were often the main ingredient in sauces, pastes, porridges and beverages. Medicinal uses were especially well‐known for the bark, which was also used for making ropes. In both communities, a total of 38 different uses were mentioned for baobab products. There were significantly more uses known by the Ottamari than by the Dendi, with use values of 8 and 5, respectively. There were no differences detected in knowledge between sexes and age classes. As a result of its nutritional and high potential market value, preservation of ethnobotanical knowledge on baobab and exchange between communities is critical.