z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Why Rice yellow mottle virus , a rapidly evolving RNA plant virus, is not efficient at breaking rymv1‐2 resistance
Author(s) -
POULICARD NILS,
PINELGALZI AGNES,
HEBRARD EUGENIE,
FARGETTE DENIS
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
molecular plant pathology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.945
H-Index - 103
eISSN - 1364-3703
pISSN - 1464-6722
DOI - 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00582.x
Subject(s) - biology , genotype , virulence , virus , genetics , plant virus , mottle , virology , genetic diversity , luteovirus , mutation , gene , population , demography , sociology
SUMMARY Rice yellow mottle virus (RYMV) reaches a high virus content in rice, is genetically highly variable and evolves rapidly. Nevertheless, only a small proportion of isolates overcome rymv1‐2 rice resistance by mutations in the VPg (viral protein genome‐linked). The accumulation rates of wild‐type (WT) and resistance‐breaking (RB) genotypes of the E‐ and T‐pathotypes of RYMV, with average and low virulence, respectively, were assessed. By quantitative reverse transcriptase‐polymerase chain reaction, it was shown that: (i) in resistant plants, both WT genotypes reached a level of 10 5 –10 7 viral copies per milligram of fresh leaf; (ii) the accumulation of RB genotypes was variable, but was always much higher than the WT, with an RB/WT accumulation ratio of up to 10 6 ; (iii) in susceptible plants, the RB genotypes were counter‐selected to a similar level. In competition experiments, there was a straightforward exclusion of WT by RB genotypes in resistant hosts. The mutation rate in VPg was more than 1 × 10 −3 mutations per site per year. Overall, a steady supply of highly adaptive RB genotypes was expected in resistant plants. However, the use of the few possible mutational pathways to virulence is tightly regulated by pathotype‐specific genetic constraints: codon usage, mutational bias and sign epistasis. In addition, genetic drift may restrict the fixation of RB mutants. Altogether, both genetic and demographic constraints contribute to the low ability of RYMV to break rymv1‐2 resistance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here