Premium
Commentary on Melson et al . (2011): Pluralistic ignorance is probably real but important questions remain about its relation to drinking and role in intervention
Author(s) -
KYPRI KYPROS,
MACLENNAN BRETT
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
addiction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.424
H-Index - 193
eISSN - 1360-0443
pISSN - 0965-2140
DOI - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03457.x
Subject(s) - social norms approach , norm (philosophy) , psychology , normative , social psychology , psychological intervention , ignorance , intervention (counseling) , perception , political science , neuroscience , psychiatry , law
Many studies, mostly involving US college students, ostensibly show that young people tend to believe that more of their peers engage in heavy episodic drinking, illicit drug use and risky sex than actually do so. College students are also found to misperceive injunctive norms, thinking that their peers are more permissive of certain risk behaviours than they really are. These errors of judgement have been framed in terms of pluralistic ignorance, described as a phenomenon in which ‘a majority of group members privately reject a norm, but assume (incorrectly) that most others accept it’