Premium
Motivation and patch treatment for HIV+ smokers: a randomized controlled trial
Author(s) -
LloydRichardson Elizabeth E.,
Stanton Cassandra A.,
Papandonatos George D.,
Shadel William G.,
Stein Michael,
Tashima Karen,
Flanigan Timothy,
Morrow Kathleen,
Neighbors Charles,
Niaura Raymond
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
addiction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.424
H-Index - 193
eISSN - 1360-0443
pISSN - 0965-2140
DOI - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02623.x
Subject(s) - medicine , abstinence , smoking cessation , randomized controlled trial , nicotine replacement therapy , odds ratio , confidence interval , psychological intervention , nicotine patch , odds , nicotine , physical therapy , psychiatry , logistic regression , alternative medicine , placebo , pathology
Aims To test the efficacy of two smoking cessation interventions in a HIV positive (HIV+) sample: standard care (SC) treatment plus nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) versus more intensive motivationally enhanced (ME) treatment plus NRT. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting HIV+ smoker referrals from eight immunology clinics in the northeastern United States. Participants A total of 444 participants enrolled in the study (mean age = 42.07 years; 63.28% male; 51.80% European American; mean cigarettes/day = 18.27). Interventions SC participants received two brief sessions with a health educator. Those setting a quit date received self‐help quitting materials and NRT. ME participants received four sessions of motivational counseling and a quit‐day counseling call. All ME intervention materials were tailored to the needs of HIV+ individuals. Measurements Biochemically verified 7‐day abstinence rates at 2‐month, 4‐month and 6‐month follow‐ups. Findings Intent‐to‐treat (ITT) abstinence rates at 2‐month, 4‐month and 6‐month follow‐ups were 12%, 9% and 9%, respectively, in the ME condition, and 13%, 10% and 10%, respectively, in the SC condition, indicating no between‐group differences. Among 412 participants with treatment utilization data, 6‐month ITT abstinence rates were associated positively with low nicotine dependence ( P = 0.02), high motivation to quit ( P = 0.04) and Hispanic American race/ethnicity ( P = 0.02). Adjusting for these variables, each additional NRT contact improved the odds of smoking abstinence by a third (odds ratio = 1.32, 95% confidence interval = 0.99–1.75). Conclusions Motivationally enhanced treatment plus NRT did not improve cessation rates over and above standard care treatment plus NRT in this HIV+ sample of smokers. Providers offering brief support and encouraging use of nicotine replacement may be able to help HIV+ patients to quit smoking.