Premium
Evaluation of an injection depot formulation of buprenorphine: placebo comparison
Author(s) -
Sigmon Stacey C.,
Wong Conrad J.,
Chausmer Allison L.,
Liebson Ira A.,
Bigelow George E.
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
addiction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.424
H-Index - 193
eISSN - 1360-0443
pISSN - 0965-2140
DOI - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00834.x
Subject(s) - buprenorphine , hydromorphone , placebo , medicine , opioid , anesthesia , depot , opioid use disorder , partial agonist , naltrexone , randomized controlled trial , agonist , alternative medicine , receptor , archaeology , pathology , history
Aims Buprenorphine is a mu‐opioid partial agonist that is marketed in a sublingual formulation as a treatment for opioid dependence. A microcapsule depot sustained‐release formulation has been developed which may offer effective treatment of opioid dependence while also minimizing risks of illicit diversion or patient non‐compliance. The present study examined the efficacy of depot buprenorphine in suppressing the opioid withdrawal syndrome and in attenuating the effects of exogenous opioid challenge. Design A placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, randomized trial. Setting A closed residential research facility. Participants A total of 15 opioid‐dependent participants were enrolled into the 6‐week study. Intervention Fifteen participants were randomized to receive a single subcutaneous depot injection containing buprenorphine (58 mg) or placebo. Two participants, both of whom received placebo, terminated participation after depot administration. Thirteen participants (six buprenorphine, seven placebo) completed the 6‐week study and were assessed throughout the study for signs and symptoms of opioid withdrawal and for response to weekly subcutaneous challenges with 3 mg hydromorphone. Measurement Subjective, physiological and observer‐rated indices of opioid withdrawal and opioid agonist effects. Findings Depot buprenorphine provided more effective relief from opioid withdrawal than placebo, as evidenced by significantly fewer buprenorphine participants requiring supplemental medications for withdrawal suppression after depot administration compared to participants receiving placebo. In the weekly hydromorphone challenge sessions, depot buprenorphine significantly reduced opioid response on measures of subjective effects and pupillary diameter. Conclusions Results from this double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study indicate that depot buprenorphine is effective in providing both withdrawal suppression and opioid blockade. Future studies examining additional doses and repeated dosing regimens with depot buprenorphine are warranted.