Premium
Should opiate addicts be involved in controlling their own detoxification? A comparison of fixed versus negotiable schedules
Author(s) -
DAWE SHARON,
GRIFFITHS PAUL,
GOSSOP MICHAEL,
STRANG JOHN
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
british journal of addiction
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.424
H-Index - 193
eISSN - 1360-0443
pISSN - 0952-0481
DOI - 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01858.x
Subject(s) - detoxification (alternative medicine) , methadone , medicine , heroin , opiate , anesthesia , psychiatry , drug , pathology , alternative medicine , receptor
This study compares the responses of opiate addicts at a London drug treatment centre to two outpatient methadone‐based detoxification programmes. These involved either a fixed (non‐negotiable) dose reduction schedule or a flexible, negotiable withdrawal schedule. In the negotiable condition, subjects were less likely to complete the detoxification programme and the mean reduction in dose achieved by the subjects in the negotiable condition was less than that in the fixed group. There was no difference between groups in programme retention at 6 weeks though subjects who remained in treatment in the negotiable group tended to extend their detoxification period beyond this point. The overall response of subjects in both groups was unsatisfactory. Only 13% of the subjects initially allocated to detoxification or 28% of those who actually started detoxification completed treatment; urine screening showed that heroin abuse was a continuing problem during treatment. The implications of these results for detoxification and drug treatment services are discussed.