Premium
Dog in the Night: The Limits of European Nationalism, 1789–1895
Author(s) -
Farrar L.L.,
McGuire Kiernan,
Thompson John E.
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
nations and nationalism
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.655
H-Index - 44
eISSN - 1469-8129
pISSN - 1354-5078
DOI - 10.1111/j.1354-5078.1998.00547.x
Subject(s) - nationalism , german , civilization , optimal distinctiveness theory , unification , power (physics) , alliance , economic history , history , political science , sociology , law , political economy , politics , archaeology , psychology , computer science , physics , quantum mechanics , psychotherapist , programming language
. The article questions the widely held view that nationalism was a significant feature of modem civilisation and particularly of nineteenth‐century Europe. Two groups of events are chosen for examination: reputedly classic instances of nationalism (the French Revolution, German responses to Napoleon, the Italian and German revolutions of 1848, Italian and German unification and the Eastern crisis of 1875‐8), and important international events which in an age of nationalism should reflect it (the Crimean War, Bismarck's alliances and the Franco‐Russian alliance). Defined as the effort of nation/peoples to defend/extend their power, nationalism is evaluated specifically for its breadth of support and its influence on decision‐makers which prove to be limited. This conclusion has implications not only for these events but also brings into question the established system of historical periodisation which presumes the distinctiveness of the nineteenth century and modem civilisation precisely because of their distinguishing features such as nationalism.