z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Lung Cancer Risk Comparison among Male Smokers between the “Six‐prefecture Cohort” in Japan and the British Physicians' Cohort
Author(s) -
Mizuno Shoichi,
Akiba Suminori,
Hirayama Takeshi
Publication year - 1989
Publication title -
japanese journal of cancer research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.035
H-Index - 141
eISSN - 1349-7006
pISSN - 0910-5050
DOI - 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1989.tb01649.x
Subject(s) - cohort , medicine , lung cancer , demography , cohort study , confidence interval , relative risk , cigarette smoking , cancer , sociology
We estimated the effective duration of cigarette smoking using the data of lung cancer mortality among male smokers of a large‐scale cohort study in Japan and evaluated its role in the lung cancer risk difference between male smokers of the Japanese cohort and the British physicians' cohort. By selecting male cohort members who answered that they had started smoking at ages 18–22 (average = 20.3), the subjects of our analysis, which numbered 49,013, were made relatively homogeneous in terms of age at which smoking was started. Assuming lung cancer mortality to be proportional to the 4.5th power of the effective duration of cigarette smoking, i.e., (age—θ) 4,5 , as was proposed on the basis of the British cohort study by Doll and Peto, the parameter θ was estimated to be 29.4 for male smokers aged 40–64 in 1966; therefore, the estimated duration of cigarette smoking was, on average, 9.1 years (95% confidence interval=5.8–11.6) shorter than that calculated from the reported age at which smoking was started. Our findings suggested that the low lung cancer mortality relative to daily cigarette consumption in Japan resulted from the shorter duration of cigarette smoking in the Japanese cohort, possibly due to the severe shortage of cigarettes during and shortly after World War II. Once the effective duration of cigarette smoking was adjusted, lung cancer mortality in the range of 5–34 cigarettes per day was fairly comparable to that observed among the cohort of male British physicians.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here