z-logo
Premium
Fracture Strength of Plate and Tubular Forms of Monolithic Silicon Carbide Produced by Chemical Vapor Deposition
Author(s) -
Cockeram Brian Vern
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
journal of the american ceramic society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.9
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1551-2916
pISSN - 0002-7820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00139.x
Subject(s) - flexural strength , materials science , composite material , microstructure , silicon carbide , mandrel , chemical vapor deposition , three point flexural test , fracture (geology) , deposition (geology) , nanotechnology , paleontology , sediment , biology
The fracture strength of silicon carbide (SiC) plate deposits produced by chemical vapor deposition (CVD) was determined from room temperature to 1500°C using a standard 4‐point flexural test method (ASTM C1161). CVD SiC materials produced by two different manufacturers are shown to have only slightly different flexural strength values, which appear to result from differences in microstructure. Although CVD deposition of SiC results in a textured grain structure, the flexural strength was shown to be independent of the CVD growth direction. The orientation of machining marks was shown to have the most significant influence on flexural strength, as expected. The fracture strength of tubular forms of SiC produced by CVD deposition directly onto a mandrel was comparable to flexural bars machined from a plate deposit. The tubular (O‐ring) specimens were much smaller in volume than the flexural bars, and higher strength values are predicted based on Weibull statistical theory for the O‐ring specimens. Differences in microstructure between the plate deposits and deposits made on a mandrel result in different flaw distributions and comparable strength values for the flexural bar and O‐ring specimens. These results indicate that compression testing of O‐rings provides a more accurate strength measurement for tubular product forms of SiC due to more representative flaw distributions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here