z-logo
Premium
Influence of Chemical Reactions in Magnesia‐Graphite Refractories: II, Effects of Aluminum and Graphite Contents in Generic Products
Author(s) -
Baudín Carmen,
Alvarez Carlos,
Moore Robert E.
Publication year - 1999
Publication title -
journal of the american ceramic society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.9
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1551-2916
pISSN - 0002-7820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1999.tb02277.x
Subject(s) - graphite , materials science , microstructure , aluminium , magnesium , young's modulus , modulus , chemical composition , metallurgy , oxygen , composite material , mineralogy , chemistry , organic chemistry
A group of magnesia‐graphite and magnesia‐graphite‐aluminum materials, the compositions of which represent a wide range of graphite contents (~10‐16.4 wt%), aluminum contents (0‐5.2 wt%), and MgO and graphite qualities, were fabricated, using standard commercial practices. Chemical analysis and determination of room‐temperature modulus of rupture (MOR) and Young's modulus, as well as a complete microstructural characterization of the as‐received materials, were performed. Mechanical characterization at high temperature (1000°, 1200°, and 1450°C) was done in terms of Young's modulus and MOR in an argon atmosphere (<1000 ppm oxygen at 1000°C). Modulus‐of‐elasticity values ranged from 4 to 16 GPa, and their evolution with temperature was determined by the evolution of the microstructure in the bulk of the specimens. A strong effect of aluminum‐metal concentration on Young's modulus overrode other microstructural differences among the materials. MOR values ranged from 6 to 20 MPa, and their evolution with temperature was determined by the evolution of the microstructure in the bulk of the specimens at the lower testing temperatures ( T lessthan equal to 1200°C) and by phase assemblages in the surface regions of the specimens‐essentially by the presence of the dense MgO zone‐at 1450°C. The thickness of the dense MgO zone in the aluminum‐containing materials was determined by the amount of aluminum and the MgO aggregate size.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here