Premium
Fracture Toughness of TiB 2 and B 4 C Using the Single‐Edge Precracked Beam, Indentation Strength, Chevron Notched Beam, and Indentation Strength Methods
Author(s) -
Conzone Samuel D.,
Blumenthal William R.,
Vainer James R.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
journal of the american ceramic society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.9
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1551-2916
pISSN - 0002-7820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1995.tb08634.x
Subject(s) - indentation , materials science , fracture toughness , composite material , enhanced data rates for gsm evolution , beam (structure) , boron carbide , chevron (anatomy) , fracture (geology) , indentation hardness , structural engineering , microstructure , telecommunications , paleontology , engineering , biology , computer science
The mode I fracture toughness ( K Ic ) of boron carbide (B 4 C) and titanium diboride (TiB 2 ) was determined using four competing techniques. The indentation strength (IS), chevron notched beam (CNB), and indentation fracture (IF) methods are common techniques that were compared to the recently standardized single‐edge precrack beam (SEPB) method. The SEPB method was more difficult to apply, but it represents the most rigorous method for K Ic determination, because it uses few assumptions and requires a direct measurement of crack length. The IS method was an expeditious and economical alternative when low indentation loads were used. CNB K Ic values were virtually rate‐independent when displacement rates less than or equal to 0.5 mm/min were used. The IF method was the least satisfactory technique, because of high variability in K c values and because of the low differentiation between the two materials studied.