Premium
Effects of Space Charge, Grain‐Boundary Segregation, and Mobility Differences Between Grain Boundary and Bulk on the Conductivity of Polycrystalline Al 2 O 3
Author(s) -
TIKU S. K.,
KRÖGER F. A.
Publication year - 1980
Publication title -
journal of the american ceramic society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.9
H-Index - 196
eISSN - 1551-2916
pISSN - 0002-7820
DOI - 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1980.tb10688.x
Subject(s) - grain boundary , crystallite , materials science , conductivity , acceptor , doping , condensed matter physics , grain boundary diffusion coefficient , mineralogy , impurity , dopant , analytical chemistry (journal) , metallurgy , chemistry , microstructure , physics , optoelectronics , organic chemistry , chromatography
The potential difference between grain boundary and bulk and the concentrations of native and foreign point defects in the bulk, the grain boundary ( gb ), and the subgrain boundary space‐charge region ( sg ) of polycrystalline Al 2 O 3 doped with acceptors are computed for the case that the dopants segregate at the grain boundaries, with either the ionized or the nonionized acceptor as the dominant species. Expressions are derived for the effective dc conductivity of a polycrystalline material on the basis of a model in which the grain has one or two shells with conductivities different from that of the bulk. Combination of the two results yields expressions for the effective ionic and electronic conductivity of doped A1 2 O 3 as a function of grain size with distribution coefficients gb/sg , mobility ratios in the various regions, and equilibrium constants as parameters. At impurity concentrations normally found in ceramics, the contribution by subgrain boundaries to conductivity may be neglected. The theoretical results are compared to published data for Al 2 O 3 :Mg, Fe, and Ti.