Premium
Further problems with the incongruence length difference test: “hypercongruence” effect and multiple comparisons
Author(s) -
Ramírez Martín J.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
cladistics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.323
H-Index - 92
eISSN - 1096-0031
pISSN - 0748-3007
DOI - 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2006.00106.x
Subject(s) - false positive paradox , test (biology) , statistics , mathematics , set (abstract data type) , false positives and false negatives , psychology , significant difference , social psychology , biology , computer science , paleontology , programming language
The incongruence length difference (ILD) test may produce artificially large significance values with the addition not only of uninformative characters, but also of informative characters not relevant to the groups in conflict. Previously reported problems with the ILD test involved cases of false positives, reporting high incongruence when none is expected. Under certain conditions, the test can suffer with the opposite problem (false negatives), reporting non‐significant values in cases of high incongruence. These opposing effects can be combined in a data set, such that a comparison over all partitions appears as congruent, while some of the pair‐wise comparisons are reported as significantly incongruent. © The Willi Hennig Society 2006.