Premium
The growth–mortality relationship in larval cohorts of Sardinops melanostictus, revealed by using two new approaches to analyse longitudinal data from otoliths
Author(s) -
Plaza G.,
Ishida M.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
journal of fish biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1095-8649
pISSN - 0022-1112
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.02012.x
Subject(s) - sardine , otolith , biology , demography , population , autoregressive model , larva , statistics , fish <actinopterygii> , mathematics , fishery , ecology , sociology
The growth–mortality relationship was assessed for larval cohorts of the Japanese sardine Sardinops melanostictus using two new approaches: (1) repeat measures in general linear model (RM‐GLMs) and (2) the autoregressive‐individual method (AIM). Both methods were compared to the traditional approach in which repeat‐measure ANOVA was used to compare the changes in increment width ( W I ) at age and otolith radii ( R O ) at age between individuals from an original population and survivors. In RM‐GLMs, both the W I at age and R O at age ( i.e. at 5, 10, 15 and 20 days) were used as the dependent variables, and the standardized residuals of both regressions R O and age and R O and total length ( L T ), age class, and day of the year as independent variables. A significant increase in W I at age and R O at age from younger to older age classes was seen as indicative of growth‐dependent selection. In AIM, the R O ‐at‐age relationship for each fish was fitted for the first 20 days, using autoregression, and then the growth traits ( i.e. slopes) between the original cohorts and survivors were compared using ANOVA. In the traditional approach, the W I at age and R O at age for the first 20 days of an original population were compared with those of survivors sampled in later stages. GLMs and traditional approaches supported the growth rate ( i.e. the faster an individual grows, the higher its probability of survival) and bigger is better ( i.e. larger individuals at any given age will have lower probability of mortality than smaller individuals of the same age) mechanisms. Furthermore, AIM showed that individuals from original cohorts had lower otolith growth rates than those from survivors, giving further support for the growth–mortality hypothesis for the larval stage of this clupeid.