z-logo
Premium
Feeding, Ichthyophonus sp. infection, distribution and growth history of Norwegian spring‐spawning herring in summer
Author(s) -
Holst J. C.,
Salvanes A. G. V.,
Johansen T.
Publication year - 1997
Publication title -
journal of fish biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1095-8649
pISSN - 0022-1112
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01956.x
Subject(s) - herring , biology , fjord , sebastes , norwegian , fishery , calanus finmarchicus , predation , clupeidae , clupea , capelin , ecology , crustacean , fish <actinopterygii> , oceanography , copepod , linguistics , philosophy , geology
After its collapse in the late 1960s, 1991 was the first year of systematic herring investigations after the Norwegian Sea stock returned to the traditional summer‐feeding areas. Of 11 prey groups three dominated the diet; Calanus finmarchicus, Parathemisto spp. and Sebastes spp. There was a high prevalence of Ichthyophonus sp. at stations in the central and western parts of the Norwegian Sea where the cpue was low. This suggests that infected individuals were unable to return from the feeding to the wintering area of the Norwegian fjords. Highest cpue were recorded between 68–73° N and 5–15° E. Age groups 2, 3 and 8 were most frequently caught and age group 8 (the 1983 year class) dominated the samples. Herring occurred in dense concentrations where C. finmarchicus dominated diet. 0‐group fish dominated diet at stations along the coast from 66–73° N and out to c . 300 km off the coast. Mature herring overlapped in distribution with 0‐group fish and Sebastes spp. contributed largely to herring diet in this area. The first rich year‐class after the collapse, the 1983 year class, had a faster growth than rich year classes from past herring periods, but slower than poor ones.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here