z-logo
Premium
Genetic discrimination of wild and hatchery populations of brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis (Mitchill), in Ontario using mitochondrial DNA analysis
Author(s) -
Danzmann R. G.,
Ihssen P. E.,
Hebert P. D. N.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
journal of fish biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.672
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1095-8649
pISSN - 0022-1112
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1991.tb05069.x
Subject(s) - biology , hatchery , salvelinus , fontinalis , mitochondrial dna , fishery , broodstock , zoology , haplotype , introgression , ecology , aquaculture , genetics , trout , genotype , fish <actinopterygii> , gene
Two brood stocks of brook charr, Sulvelinus fontinalis , are currently maintained by the Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources. The Nipigon brood stock originated from Lake Nipigon, in north‐central Ontario, while the Hills Lake stock is believed to have been produced by hybridizing several strains (including charr from a Pennsylvania hatchery as well as charr from Ontario) in the past. The mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) variability of these brood stocks was characterized using 51 hexanucleotide restriction enzymes. Eleven restriction enzymes, Acc I, Am I, Bun I, Bun II, Hind III, Nco I, Nde I, Nhe I, Nsi I, Pst I and Sph I, were polymorphic between the two brood stocks. Eight hatchery mtDNA haplotypes were detected showing a maximum of 0.41 % sequence divergence. Seven haplotypes are present in the Hills Lake strain, and two in the Nipigon strain. These mtDNA haplotypes are useful markers to determine the degree of reproductive success between planted and native fish. In one comparison in southern Ontario, less than 20% of the wild fish sampled from the head water regions of a small drainage entering Lake Erie could have resulted from random introgression with hatchery fish planted further downstream, because most of these fish possessed a unique Acc 1 cut site. This is one of the few examples in stock analysis studies where such a high degree of genetic discrimination is evident between hatchery and native fish.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here